Correct.
The range difference is roughly proportional to the usable battery pack capacity difference: ~45% greater for the 94 Ah battery pack assuming new capacities.
The 20" wheel option was available for all trim levels and not standard in Tera World.
I've needed the REX once in the year I've owned my '17 94 Ah. And that was optional, since I wanted to see how it worked. Could've taken my wife's gassed-up hybrid rather than my mostly-discharged i3 on a 40 mile both ways round trip.YKK wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2020 3:02 pmMy next question is about REX that I'm hoping some REX users would be able to chime in on. Do you ever actually use it? Is it "okay" to just never use it or will that cause problems eventually? Maintenance an issue for it? I like the idea of having security but I'd like to know the costs besides increased purchase price.
If you need tires for winter weather -- meaning snow, ice or temps below 40F -- and don't want a second set of wheels and tires, you'll need the 19" ones. Only Summer tires are available for the 20" rims -- there's no snow tire or all season M+S tire available for that wheel. If you won't be using the car in winter conditions, you can base your decision on looks, comfort, handling and vulnerability to road hazards.Next question is the rims. All the loaded 2014's I've seen have 20" rims. Is this just because anyone paying extra for the leather+NAV also springs for the wheel upgrade or is it actually part of the Terra package? Reading about the 20" here and other places online it seems they are simply functionally not as good as the 19" and will result in a rougher ride.
Most of the reliability issues with the i3 stem from the REX. If you don't NEED it (most people don't, at least with a 2017+), you should avoid it IMO. It also reintroduces all the maintenance of an ICE car (vs just brake fluid for the BEV) and makes the car >10% heavier (bad for everything).YKK wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2020 3:02 pmMy first look was at 2017 REX models but the price difference between a 2017 and 2014 seems to be around 6-8k (~14k vs. ~20-22k) at comparable mileages. The only major difference between the two is the battery capacity, correct? What is the actual range difference taking into account the age and say... 50k miles? I've really shifted my search to 2014's due to the cost savings but not sure if that's a bad idea long term. My next question is about REX that I'm hoping some REX users would be able to chime in on. Do you ever actually use it? Is it "okay" to just never use it or will that cause problems eventually? Maintenance an issue for it? I like the idea of having security but I'd like to know the costs besides increased purchase price. Next question is the rims. All the loaded 2014's I've seen have 20" rims. Is this just because anyone paying extra for the leather+NAV also springs for the wheel upgrade or is it actually part of the Terra package? Reading about the 20" here and other places online it seems they are simply functionally not as good as the 19" and will result in a rougher ride.
The 94aH battery actually has 57% more capacity than the 60aH batteryalohart wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2020 7:42 pmCorrect.
The range difference is roughly proportional to the usable battery pack capacity difference: ~45% greater for the 94 Ah battery pack assuming new capacities.
A number of owners of 60 Ah i3's (2014-2016) are reporting significant loss of actual range (including me). Whether this is due to actual battery cell degradation or the battery management system decreasing the usable capacity to minimize the rate of degradation in hopes of minimizing the number of battery capacity warranty claims remains unknown. The effect on the driver is the same: less usable range.
Similar reports seem rare with the 94 Ah battery pack (2017-2018). Whether that will change in a couple of years as 94 Ah battery packs age and experience more charge/discharge cycles also remains unknown. My sense is that the 94 Ah battery cells seem to be degrading less slowly.
The 20" wheel option was available for all trim levels and not standard in Tera World.
That's gross capacity. The nominal usable capacity of the 94 Ah battery pack is 27.2 kWh compared with 18.8 kWh for the 60 Ah battery pack making the nominal usable capacity of the 94 Ah battery pack 45% greater. The 60 Ah battery pack's usable capacity is 87% of its gross capacity compared with 82% for the 94 Ah battery pack. The larger percentage of unusable capacity of the 94 Ah battery pack has likely helped reduce its cell degradation rate.
Not entirely true, at least for the 2014 U.S. model. Giga and Tera World include Comfort Access and the Universal Garage Door Opener, neither of which could be added as an option on Mega World i3's. I believe that at some point, Comfort Access and the Universal Garage Door Opener also became standard with Mega World.Valleeboi02 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 2:02 pmThe Terra World trim is only the top trim when it comes to the interior and it has nothing to do with the options you can choose.. I've seen Terra trims without a rear camera, business nav, no Hardon speakers, no ACC or no self parking and no front end Collision warning..
Yes, the only difference in the 2014 model and the later 2017 model is the battery capacity and interior colors..
This is certainly not true for all 2014 i3's. The Idaho National Library bought and tested 3 new 2013 i3 BEV's and measured their usable battery pack capacity over ~15 months and ~12k miles. All of them lost ~7.5% of their new usable capacity. A 4th 2014 BEV lost 3.5% usable battery pack capacity over only 3 months and 4k miles.Valleeboi02 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 2:02 pm2014 i3 should have a normal battery degradation of about 1.5 percent after 6 years of normal level 1 and level 2 charging..=